Martin Luther King
by Dr. Jasmin Bey Cowin

Assistant Professor and Practicum Coordinator

TESOL and Bilingual Department

Graduate School of Education

Touro College

EPFP alumna (NY 2018–2019)

Vice President, Chair Elect 2021, NYS TESOL organization

New York, USA

In his letter from the Birmingham jail, Martin Luther King, Jr., responded to the critical publication “A Call for Unity” by eight clergymen from diverse denominations who chastised both his presence and his nonviolent demonstrations and sit-ins in Birmingham as “unwise and untimely.”

In his letter, King established a common background with his “fellow clergymen” through classical, literary-historical, and biblical allusions to clarify and declare his reasoning about the nonviolent protests of the Civil Rights Movement and the legitimacy of his personal presence in Birmingham. One of the main threads in King’s letter was his underlying dialogue around the still timely question of whether individuals are ever morally justified in breaking civil law. He addressed six major issues in his letter: negotiation, timing, breaking laws, triggering violence, the myth of time, and extremism. To illustrate his points and appeal to logos, ethos, and pathos, King used classical, historical, and biblical allusions as well as quoted historical idealists as part of his rhetorical strategy.

His references to historical events such as the discovery of the Americas, Nazi resistance, and the Boston Tea Party established connections among morally bankrupt oppressive societies, silent white moderates, transformative historical events, and figures of high moral and ethical repute (both present and past), concluding that the Civil Rights Movement justified man’s use of civil disobedience when faced with injustice. In response to the clergymen’s claim that his use of direct action was “untimely,” King appealed to pathos by saying, “We have waited for more than three hundred and forty years for our God-given and constitutional rights,” a reference to Christopher Columbus’s discovery of the Americas. He continued his arguments with ethos, pointing to the “legality” of Hitler’s actions in his pursuit of the complete annihilation of King’s “Jewish brothers” versus human morality. He then juxtaposed Hitler’s legality with the illegality of the Hungarian freedom fighters in their struggle to obtain freedom. “We can never forget that what everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.” He led readers to the conclusion that devotion to “order” rather than justice blocks the “flow of social progress.” His syllogism here is that engaging in civil disobedience and breaking unjust laws because one obeys “higher laws” is “in reality expressing the very highest respect for the law.”

King used the pathos of the early Christians’ struggle as his justification for “the mighty struggle to rid our nation of racial and economic injustice.” Furthermore, King asked powerful rhetorical questions: “Was not Jesus an extremist for love? Was not Amos an extremist for justice? Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel? Was not Martin Luther an extremist … and John Bunyan?” By mentioning influential biblical and theological figures who suffered for their beliefs, King appealed to both pathos and ethos by showing the moral exemplar personified and the inspiring influence they had on Christianity. King specifically aimed for pathos when he mentioned three Christian extremists who were crucified, including Jesus Christ, the Church’s representative of mankind’s highest potential of a human being. For King, “the church as the body of Christ” had the moral obligation to stand against unjust laws. He quoted St. Augustine, who said, “An unjust law is no law at all.” He pointed out that Christians have “to obey God rather than man” and that a living Church, the true ecclesia, as the representation of Christ-like goodness and hope of the world, needs to be a thermostat that transforms the mores of society.

In my opinion, King’s message and his call for “radiant stars of love and brotherhood” can be experienced through Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D Minor, Op. 125. Beethoven’s only vocal symphony is a statement of yearning for freedom in the repressive political environment of Europe after the Congress of Vienna and celebrates ” All people become brothers, Where thy gentle wing abides. “ 

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of important news and special executive deals.

You May Also Like

U.S. plans to retaliate against digital taxes and Airbus tariffs

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) announced the results…

9 Ways to Prevent Work From Home Burnout

The COVID-19 pandemic has created monumental shifts in how the world moves…

White House Advisor Opposes Withdrawal of Tariffs as Epidemic Hits China’s Economy

When Peter Navarro, a trade adviser to US President Donald Trump, accepted…

Major US policy turns to declare that Israel’s Jewish colonial zone is not in violation of international law

On November 18th, the United States expressed its support for Israel’s right…