The ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza continues with no immediate resolution in sight, raising questions about why Israel has not yet ended the war. The answer lies in a complex web of military objectives, political considerations, security fears, and the absence of a viable long-term solution.
1. Unfinished Military Goals
Israel has stated that one of its primary objectives is the complete dismantling of Hamas’ military infrastructure. Officials argue that a premature ceasefire would leave Hamas in place, capable of rearming and launching future attacks. From Israel’s perspective, ending the war without “decisive victory” could mean repeating past cycles of violence.
2. Hostage and Casualty Concerns
The October 7 Hamas attack, which resulted in the deaths and abductions of many Israeli civilians, has created intense public pressure on the Israeli government to bring all hostages home and ensure such an attack never happens again. Many Israelis see continued military operations as necessary to secure the release of remaining hostages and restore national security.
3. Domestic Politics and Netanyahu’s Position
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces intense political pressure. His coalition includes far-right parties that strongly oppose any concessions to Hamas or a negotiated ceasefire. Ending the war without a clear, punitive blow to Hamas could threaten the stability of his government. Critics also argue that prolonging the war serves as a political shield for Netanyahu amid domestic unrest and calls for accountability over security failures.
4. No Clear Post-War Plan for Gaza
There is no consensus—either within Israel or among international actors—about who should govern Gaza after the war ends. Israel refuses to reoccupy Gaza, yet it also rejects Hamas’s continued control. The absence of a stable, acceptable alternative leaves the conflict in a dangerous limbo.
5. International Pressure vs. Security Calculations
Although international criticism is mounting, especially over humanitarian conditions in Gaza, Israel continues to prioritize its own security calculations. Israeli officials argue that withdrawing under pressure could embolden hostile actors across the region, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iranian-backed militias.
Conclusion
The question of why Israel hasn’t ended the war with Gaza is tied to a larger struggle over security, deterrence, and regional power dynamics. While a ceasefire may bring short-term relief, Israeli leadership insists it could lead to long-term instability if Hamas remains intact. Until there’s a credible political and security alternative, a sustainable end to the conflict appears elusive.
