As global leaders increase pressure for a ceasefire and humanitarian resolution, Israel appears more determined than ever to pursue a full-scale military and political takeover of Gaza. Emboldened by tactical battlefield victories and a resurgence of political support from U.S. President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shown no signs of yielding to international isolation.
In recent weeks, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have pushed deeper into southern Gaza, striking what they claim are Hamas strongholds while further dismantling militant tunnels and infrastructure. Despite widespread destruction, civilian casualties, and condemnation from the United Nations and several Western allies, Netanyahu’s government has reaffirmed its commitment to eliminating Hamas “once and for all.”
Speaking at a recent press conference, Netanyahu made it clear that Israel’s objective is not just military neutralization but a total reconfiguration of governance in Gaza. “We will not stop until Gaza is no longer a base for terrorism,” he said. “The future of this region must be rebuilt with Israeli and international cooperation—but not under the shadow of Hamas.”
This statement comes amid growing diplomatic backlash. European capitals, Arab states, and even parts of Washington’s foreign policy establishment have criticized Israel’s refusal to engage in peace negotiations. Yet Trump’s public support for Netanyahu, delivered via social media and campaign rallies, has given the Israeli leadership political cover to press on. Trump recently said, “Israel has every right to defend itself and clean up Gaza. We would do the same.”
Behind the scenes, the geopolitical calculus is shifting. With Hamas weakened but still operational, and with Gaza’s infrastructure severely damaged, questions remain over how a long-term occupation or administration would be handled. Some reports suggest Israel is exploring a multi-phase plan to install a non-Hamas transitional authority—potentially with Gulf state backing—but such proposals have little support from Palestinian leaders or the international community.
Meanwhile, humanitarian agencies warn of catastrophe. Gaza’s healthcare system is on the brink of collapse, clean water is scarce, and over 1.5 million people are displaced. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has urged “immediate de-escalation” and “unrestricted humanitarian access,” calling Israel’s current campaign “unsustainable and unjust.”
Nevertheless, in Tel Aviv, the prevailing narrative remains one of national security and deterrence. Government insiders argue that a strong hand in Gaza now will prevent decades of future conflict. But critics, including Israeli opposition leaders, warn that the absence of a clear post-war vision could leave the region trapped in perpetual instability.
For now, Israel remains defiant. With global pressure mounting but diplomatic alliances shifting, the road ahead in Gaza could define not only Netanyahu’s legacy but the future of Middle Eastern geopolitics.
