23 hours ago

True Story Behind Builder.ai Crash

1 min read

What Really Happened to the $1 Billion “No-Code” Unicorn?

Builder.ai – the AI-powered app development platform that promised to “democratize software creation” – has suffered a spectacular fall from grace in 2025. Here’s the inside story behind the crash of this once high-flying startup:

The House of Cards Begins to Shake (Early 2025)

  • Massive layoffs (40% of workforce) announced in February despite $250M Series D funding in 2023
  • Key executives including CTO and CFO abruptly depart
  • Customers begin complaining about unfinished projects and refund demands

The Breaking Point (May 2025)

  • Investors discover the company had been misrepresenting:
    • Actual AI capabilities (most work done by human contractors)
    • Customer numbers (inflated by 300%)
    • Revenue recognition (counting demo projects as sales)
  • Lead investor SoftBank demands forensic audit
  • $120 million missing from corporate accounts

The Smoking Guns

  1. The “AI” Was Mostly Human
    • Investigation revealed 85% of delivered apps were built by underpaid developers in India and Eastern Europe
    • “Natasha” AI was essentially an overglorified project management tool
  2. Financial Shell Game
    • Company was burning $18M/month while reporting “profitability”
    • Creative accounting hid $47M in unpaid vendor bills
  3. Founder’s Questionable Spending
    • CEO Sachin Dev Duggal allegedly used company funds for:
      • $12M London penthouse
      • Private jet leases
      • Lavish “business development” parties

The Aftermath

  • Interpol warrant issued for Duggal (current whereabouts unknown)
  • Microsoft (major partner) files $75M fraud lawsuit
  • 1,200+ small businesses left with half-built apps
  • Indian government opens money laundering probe

Why This Matters

Builder.ai’s collapse exposes deeper issues in the AI startup bubble:

  • Many “AI” companies are just outsourcing shops with good PR
  • Investor FOMO enabling reckless spending and fraud
  • Lack of technical due diligence in hot sectors

Final Thought: This wasn’t just a business failure – it was a calculated deception that crossed into alleged criminal territory. The fallout may lead to tighter regulations for AI startups seeking funding.

author avatar
Josh Weiner

Don't Miss